Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Community Schools Update

In collaboration with Seattle Public Schools and other partners, the Alliance is engaged in research and community discussions on the Community Schools strategy, an approach to public education showing promise in several areas across the country.

While there are numerous Community Schools models in different regions, there is no single program design. But in general, a Community Schools (CS) approach engages partners in a coordinated system that offers a range of supports to children, youth and families before, during and after school.

Partners include educators, health and social service agencies, youth development organizations, parents, volunteers, business, and others. In general:
  • The school becomes a “hub” or local focal point for student, family and neighborhood engagement, a place where school-community connections are built and reinforced.

  • Programs may include pre-school/early learning, academic support, counseling, student health clinics, family engagement, access to basic services, refugee assistance, evening programs for adults (e.g., parenting support, language and job skills, etc.) and others.

  • Broadly speaking, the vision is:
  • Children are ready to learn when they enter school and every day thereafter.
  • All students learn and achieve to high standards.
  • Young people are well prepared for adult roles in the workplace and future families.
  • Parents and community members are involved with the school and committed to their own life-long learning.
  • Neighborhoods are safe, supportive and engaged.

In a recent survey, we learned there are over 300 community based organizations delivering numerous on-site and off-site services to Seattle students. Currently, a few schools do benefit from a coordinated approach to these services (e.g., the Community Learning Centers in some middle schools and the federally funded Full Services Community Schools Program at two high schools). However, the district and others agree that a system-wide strategy in which providers and schools align to achieve specific goals would reduce fragmentation, improve services and impact academic outcomes.

In partnership with the district, our work to date includes:

  • Interviewing other CS projects to benefit from the lessons they learned in start-up and implementation (e.g., Children’s Aid Bureau in New York, Chicago Public Schools, LINC in Independence, Missouri, SUN Schools in Portland, Cincinnati Strive, and Harlem Children’s Zone).

  • Surveying and interviewing local service providers to document the number, types and locations of student services, the level of coordination with schools and other providers, and other information.

  • Developing a catalog of services that will be posted very soon to the Alliance’s website (we’ll let you know when it’s available).

  • Engaging with funders, government officials, higher education and others who may be interested in supporting partnerships between schools and communities (e.g., Seattle Foundation, Seattle University and others).

  • Researching national models to learn about the planning and implementation of these initiatives.

  • Convening district and community partners to work toward a common vision of what this strategy would look like.

The Seattle School Board continues to study this promising approach as we conduct research and analysis, and engage the community about the model. For further information about the CS strategy in general, visit http://www.communityschools.org/. For local updates, stay tuned to the Alliance blog.

- Karen Tollenaar Demorest, AFE

27 comments:

  1. Hey, Alliance!

    How come Dr. Goodloe-Johnson says she isn't on your Board anymore?

    Your web site claims that she is a Board member but she just did a disclosure document for the District and didn't include you. Moreover, she doesn't include her position on your board on her biography.

    So is she off the Alliance Board or did she fail to make full disclosure?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here's an inappropriate link for ya, Charlie -

    http://www.ourschoolscoalition.org/
    documents/Our_Schools_polling_
    summary.pdf

    It's inappropriate because the Alliance's Our Schools Coalition (Strategies 360) was given, by the district, a list of parents and educators, which list was then used to generate the notoriuos anti-teacher push poll (and S360 having that list is illegal)

    The inappropriate part is that for an "organization" purporting to support academia, this "polling summary" has had its methodology changed three times! Highly inappropriate for research, eh? First it said it got the list of names from SPS. Then it said it got it from SPS and correlated it with a King County voter list. THEN it removed any reference to where it got the list: I guess they figured out what they did was a) illegal and b) unethical.

    Highly inappropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Alliance... just wanted to do a bit of bragging... we got 360 signatures on our petition in just 10 days... your Our Schools Coalition only got 60 in more than three months now...

    Check out our Declaration of No Confidence in Maria Goodloe Johnson... read the comments from real people, real SPS people living daily life in the District... maybe you'd like to join us here in the real world and sign on?

    http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?S3B62010&1

    Oh, and what do you think about the fact that staffs at 10 schools have passed no confidence resolutions in the Super? Ballard, Franklin, Schmitz Park, Laurelhurst, Sanislo, Ida B Wells, Maple, Orca, Green Lake and John Rogers....

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No Confidence Votes:

    Word out of West Seattle High has it that teaching staff have voted No Confidence in MGJ...

    preliminary votes are:
    Out of 42 ballots turned in, 4 voted to abstain; 3 voted "confidence" in the superintendant; 35 voted "No confidence."

    That makes 11 schools now:

    Ballard, Franklin (straw poll), West Seattle High, Schmitz Park, Sanislo, Laurelhurst, Maple, Greenlake, Ida B Well, Orca and John Rogers (signature #340 on the Community Declaration here: http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?S3B62010&1, which stands at 364 votes of No Confidence...)

    ReplyDelete
  27. If Dr. Goodloe-Johnson's seat on the Alliance Board is vacant, I'll take it.

    ReplyDelete